Long-term impact of an educational antimicrobial stewardship programme in primary care on infections caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in the community: an interrupted time-series analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence on the ecological effect and sustainability of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) in primary-care settings. We aimed to determine whether a multimodal, educational ASP would be sustainable in the long-term and reduce the incidence of infections caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in the community by optimising antibiotic use. METHODS: We did this quasi-experimental intervention study in 214 primary health centres of four primary health-care districts in Andalusia, Spain. Local multidisciplinary teams, comprised of general practitioners, paediatricians, primary-care pharmacists, and epidemiologists, were created in each district and implemented a multimodal, education-based ASP. The core activity of the programme consisted of regular one-to-one educational interviews between a reference interviewing physician and prescribing physicians from each centre on the appropriateness of their most recent (same or preceding day) antibiotic prescriptions based on a structured questionnaire. Appropriate prescribing was defined as compliance of all checklist items with the reference guidelines. An average of five educational interviews were scheduled per prescriber per study year. We did an interrupted time-series analysis to assess the effect of the intervention on quarterly antibiotic use (prescription and collection by the patient) and quality of prescriptions (as defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day) and incidence per 1000 inhabitants of E coli producing extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) isolated from urine samples. FINDINGS: The study was done between January, 2012, and December, 2017, in a pre-intervention period of 2012-13 and an intervention period of 2014-17. Throughout the study period, there were 1387 physicians (1116 general practicioners and 271 paediatricians) in the included health centres serving a mean population of 1 937 512 people (299 331 children and 1 638 181 adults). 24 150 educational interviews were done over the 4 years. Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing was identified in 1794 (36·5%) of 4917 educational interviews in 2014 compared with 1793 (26·9%) of 6665 in 2017 (p<0·0001). The intervention was associated with a sustained reduction in the use of ciprofloxacin (relative effect -15·9%, 95% CI -23·9 to -8·0) and cephalosporins (-22·6%, -35·9 to -9·2), and a sustained increase in the use of amoxicillin (22·2%, 6·4 to 38·0) and fosfomycin trometamol (6·1%, 2·6 to 9·6). The incidence density of ESBL-producing E coli decreased by -0·028 cases per 1000 inhabitants (95% CI -0·034 to -0·021) after the start of the programme, reversing the pre-intervention increase and leading to a relative reduction of -65·6% (-68·2 to -63·0) 4 years later. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that implementation of a multimodal ASP in primary care that is based on individual educational interviews improves the use of antibiotics and results in a sustained significant reduction of infections by ESBL-producing E coli in the community. This information should encourage the implementation of ASPs in primary care. FUNDING: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Government (PI14/01523).

Revisión de la medicación en ancianos polimedicados en riesgo vascular: ensayo aleatorizado y controlado / A review of the medication in polymedicated elderly with vascular risk: a randomised controlled trial

Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad de una intervención basada en la revisión de la medicación dirigida a mejorar la adecuación de los tratamientos a recomendaciones establecidas, el control tensional, lipídico y glucémico de pacientes mayores polimedicados en alto riesgo vascular, en comparación con la asistencia sanitaria habitual. Diseño: Estudio controlado, aleatorizado, con evaluación ciega. Emplazamiento: Catorce centros de salud de Andalucía. Participantes: Se incluyeron 323 personas mayores de 65 años con enfermedad o riesgo vascular alto y polimedicadas. Intervención: Un farmacéutico entrevista al paciente, revisa la adecuación de cada tratamiento teniendo en cuenta los datos de la historia clínica, elabora propuesta de modificaciones y las comunica al médico de familia o enfermera. El grupo control recibe asistencia habitual. Mediciones principales: Proporción de pacientes con uso adecuado de ácido acetilsalicílico en dosis bajas, presión arterial, colesterol LDL, hemoglobina glucosilada y calidad de vida. Resultados: De la población estudiada (edad media de 74 años, 61% mujeres), el 41% presenta enfermedad vascular. Diez meses después de la intervención (tasa de pérdidas del 18,3%) se observó que más pacientes del grupo intervenido frente al control tomaban ácido acetilsalicílico en bajas dosis (52,3 vs. 38,6%; p = 0,024). No se observaron diferencias significativas en otras variables. La calidad de vida percibida tiende a ser mejor, no significativamente, en los intervenidos en 6,1 puntos (escala de 100; p=0,051). Conclusión: La revisión sistemática de la medicación mejora la adecuación de uso del tratamiento antiagregante en ancianos polimedicados en alto riesgo vascular, sin afectar negativamente su calidad de vida. No se constatan mejoras en otras variables(AU)

Objective: To analyse the effectiveness of a medication review based on intervention directed at improving the appropriateness of drug treatments according to the established guidelines, as well as blood pressure, serum lipid and blood glucose control in elderly patients on multiple medication, and cardiovascular disease or high risk of cardiovascular disease. Design: A randomised controlled trial with blind evaluation. Setting: Fourteen Primary Health Care centres in Andalusia. Participants: A total of 323 patients older than 65 on polypharmacy and cardiovascular disease or high risk of cardiovascular disease. Intervention: A pharmacist interviewed the patient, reviewed the appropriateness of the drug treatment, taking in account health record data, proposed modifications and communicated them to the general practitioner or nurse. The control group received usual health care. Main measurements: Percentage of patients with appropriate use of low doses of acetylsalicylic acid, blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, HbA1c, and quality of life scores. Results: A total of 41% of patients (average age 74, 61% women) had cardiovascular disease. Ten months after the intervention (18.3% withdrawals), more patients in the intervention group used low dose acetylsalicylic acid than in the control group (52.3% vs 38.6%; P=.024). There were no differences between groups in intermediate clinic outcomes. Quality of life scores improve in intervention group by 6.1 points (100 points scale), but was not statistically significant (P=.051). Conclusion: Clinical medication review improves the appropriateness of antiplatelet treatment in the elderly on polypharmacy and with high risk of cardiovascular disease. No improvement in biochemistry measurements was found(AU)

Prevalencia de polimedicación y riesgo vascular en la población mayor de 65 años / Prevalence of multiple medication and cardiovascular risk in patients over 65 years

Objetivo: Estudiar la prevalencia de polimedicación en mayores de 65 años. Diseño: Estudio descriptivo transversal. Emplazamiento: Distritos sanitarios de atención primaria Sevilla y Jerez-Costa Noroeste. Participantes: Población mayor de 65 años, seleccionada por un procedimiento aleatorio estratificando por centros. Se excluyeron pacientes institucionalizados, con trastornos de salud mental mayores y enfermedad terminal. Mediciones principales: Se definió polimedicación como el consumo de 5 o más fármacos de forma continuada durante los últimos 6 meses, basado en el registro en historia clínica. Se exploraron otras características de los pacientes mediante entrevista a una submuestra seleccionada aleatoriamente. Resultados: Se evaluaron las historias clínicas de 2.919 pacientes procedentes de 14 centros de salud. La prevalencia encontrada fue de 49,6% (IC 95%: 47,7-51,4), con un rango entre centros de un 33% (IC 95%: 26,8-39,3) a un 82% (IC 95%: 74,3-89,7). El 90,2% (IC 95%: 88,7-91,8) tenía criterios de entrada al Proceso Asistencial Integrado Riesgo Vascular. La entrevista confirmó un consumo promedio de 8,7 medicamentos (IC 95%: 8,4-9,0). Un 83,2% (IC 95%: 78,9-87,4) eran pacientes en riesgo vascular alto. Conclusiones: La prevalencia de polimedicación en mayores de 65 años es cercana al 50%, con amplia variabilidad entre centros. El consumo promedio de medicamentos por paciente es de 8 y la gran mayoría son pacientes en riesgo vascular alto(AU)

Objetive: To describe the prevalence of multiple medication in patients over 65 years. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Sevilla and Jerez-Costa North-West Primary Health Care Districts. Participants: Patients older than 65 years randomly chosen from district databases. Patients in nursing homes, with major mental disease, or end-of- life situations were excluded. Main measurements: Multiple medication was defined as a prescription of five or more drugs during the last six months. We assessed the medication used by clinical health records audit. Other characteristics were studied by interviewing a subsample of patients. Results: A total of 2,919 clinical health records from 14 centres were reviewed. The prevalence of multiple medication was 49.6% (95% CI: 47.7-51.4) with a range from 33% (95% CI: 26.8-39.3) to 82% (95% CI: 74,3-89,7) between centres. The large majority of patients (90.2% [95% CI: 88.7-91.8]) of patients showed criteria to be included in Cardiovascular Risk Health Care Process. Interviewed patients confirmed taking an average of 8.7 drugs (95% CI: 8.4-9.0). Among them, 83.2% (95% CI: 78.9-87.4) were high cardiovascular risk patients. Conclusions: Prevalence of multiple medication in patients over 65 years is about 50% with wide variations between centres. The number of drugs per patient ratio was close to eight. A large majority of them were high risk cardiovascular patients(AU)

[A review of the medication in polymedicated elderly with vascular risk: a randomised controlled trial]. / Revisión de la medicación en ancianos polimedicados en riesgo vascular: ensayo aleatorizado y controlado.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness of a medication review based on intervention directed at improving the appropriateness of drug treatments according to the established guidelines, as well as blood pressure, serum lipid and blood glucose control in elderly patients on multiple medication, and cardiovascular disease or high risk of cardiovascular disease. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial with blind evaluation. SETTING: Fourteen Primary Health Care centres in Andalusia PARTICIPANTS: A total of 323 patients older than 65 on polypharmacy and cardiovascular disease or high risk of cardiovascular disease. INTERVENTION: A pharmacist interviewed the patient, reviewed the appropriateness of the drug treatment, taking in account health record data, proposed modifications and communicated them to the general practitioner or nurse. The control group received usual health care. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of patients with appropriate use of low doses of acetylsalicylic acid, blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, HbA(1c), and quality of life scores. RESULTS: A total of 41% of patients (average age 74, 61% women) had cardiovascular disease. Ten months after the intervention (18.3% withdrawals), more patients in the intervention group used low dose acetylsalicylic acid than in the control group (52.3% vs 38.6%; P=.024). There were no differences between groups in intermediate clinic outcomes. Quality of life scores improve in intervention group by 6.1 points (100 points scale), but was not statistically significant (P=.051). CONCLUSION: Clinical medication review improves the appropriateness of antiplatelet treatment in the elderly on polypharmacy and with high risk of cardiovascular disease. No improvement in biochemistry measurements was found.

[Prevalence of multiple medication and cardiovascular risk in patients over 65 years]. / Prevalencia de polimedicación y riesgo vascular en la población mayor de 65 años.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of multiple medication in patients over 65 years. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Sevilla and Jerez-Costa North-West Primary Health Care Districts. PARTICIPANTS: Patients older than 65 years randomly chosen from district databases. Patients in nursing homes, with major mental disease, or end-of- life situations were excluded. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Multiple medication was defined as a prescription of five or more drugs during the last six months. We assessed the medication used by clinical health records audit. Other characteristics were studied by interviewing a subsample of patients. RESULTS: A total of 2,919 clinical health records from 14 centres were reviewed. The prevalence of multiple medication was 49.6% (95% CI: 47.7-51.4) with a range from 33% (95% CI: 26.8-39.3) to 82% (95% CI: 74,3-89,7) between centres. The large majority of patients (90.2% [95% CI: 88.7-91.8]) of patients showed criteria to be included in Cardiovascular Risk Health Care Process. Interviewed patients confirmed taking an average of 8.7 drugs (95% CI: 8.4-9.0). Among them, 83.2% (95% CI: 78.9-87.4) were high cardiovascular risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of multiple medication in patients over 65 years is about 50% with wide variations between centres. The number of drugs per patient ratio was close to eight. A large majority of them were high risk cardiovascular patients.

Estudio sobre la utilización y adecuación de absorbentes para la incontinencia urinaria en un distrito de atención primaria / The use and suitability of absorbent products for urinary incontinence in a primary health care district

Objetivo: Calcular el consumo de absorbentes en pacientes con incontinencia urinaria pertenecientes al Distrito Sanitario de Atención Primaria Sevilla (DSAPS) y comparar la evolución a lo largo de los años 2005-2009, así como, calcular el gasto sanitario que supone dicho consumo y su variación en el periodo estudiado. Método. Estudio observacional descriptivo transversal sobre la utilización de absorbentes de incontinencia urinaria (AIU) en el DSAPS entre 2005 y 2009. La población de estudio fueron los pacientes registrados a los que se les dispensó AIU durante dicho periodo. Indicadores principales: número de envases de absorbentes/número de tarjetas ajustadas por edad del paciente y por tipo de aportación (TAFE) y gasto sanitario en AIU/TAFE. Resultados. Entre los años 2005 y 2009 se observa un crecimiento de prescripción en absorbentes ajustado por TAFE del 0,71%. Por áreas, el incremento fue del 1,06% en el área Virgen del Rocío y del 1,28% en el área hospitalaria Virgen de Macarena. El gasto sanitario empleado en el consumo de AIU durante el total de los cinco años fue de 4.100.765€. Ésto supuso un crecimiento del gasto sanitario del 17,8%. Conclusiones. Ha habido un incremento en el consumo de absorbentes a lo largo del tiempo, lo que se traduce también en un aumento del gasto sanitario. Ante esto, cabe quizás plantearse una intervención dirigida a los prescriptores que potencie el tratamiento escalonado y multifactorial de la IU (AU)

Objective: To calculate the use of absorbent products in patients with urinary incontinence in the Seville District Primary Health Care, and to compare the use over time, and to calculate the health costs and their variation during the period 2005-2009. Method. A cross-sectional and descriptive observational study was conducted on the use of urinary incontinence absorbents in the Seville District Primary Health Care, from 2005 and 2009. Patients registered as using urinary incontinence absorbents (UIA) during that period were included as the study population. Main variables: number of absorbent packages/number of healthcare cards by patient age and by type of contribution, and cost of UIA/number of cards by patient age and by type of social security contribution. Results. There was an increase of 0.71% in the prescription of absorbents by healthcare card, patient age and by type of contribution. When comparing the different Health Areas, there was an increase of 1.06% within the Virgen del Rocío Hospital Area and an increase of 1.28% within Virgen de Macarena Hospital Area. The health expense incurred in the use of UIA during these five years was 4,100,765 €, which is an increase of 17.8%. Conclusions. There is a high increase in the use of UIA with time, causing an increase in the health costs. There was also a high frequency in the use of special beds. Therefore, it would be reasonable to train the prescribers to promote progressive and multidisciplinary treatment of UI (AU)

[The use and suitability of absorbent products for urinary incontinence in a primary health care district]. / Estudio sobre la utilización y adecuación de absorbentes para la incontinencia urinaria en un distrito de atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the use of absorbent products in patients with urinary incontinence in the Seville District Primary Health Care, and to compare the use over time, and to calculate the health costs and their variation during the period 2005-2009. METHOD: A cross-sectional and descriptive observational study was conducted on the use of urinary incontinence absorbents in the Seville District Primary Health Care, from 2005 and 2009. Patients registered as using urinary incontinence absorbents (UIA) during that period were included as the study population. MAIN VARIABLES: number of absorbent packages/number of healthcare cards by patient age and by type of contribution, and cost of UIA/number of cards by patient age and by type of social security contribution. RESULTS: There was an increase of 0.71% in the prescription of absorbents by healthcare card, patient age and by type of contribution. When comparing the different Health Areas, there was an increase of 1.06% within the Virgen del Rocío Hospital Area and an increase of 1.28% within Virgen de Macarena Hospital Area. The health expense incurred in the use of UIA during these five years was 4,100,765 €, which is an increase of 17.8%. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high increase in the use of UIA with time, causing an increase in the health costs. There was also a high frequency in the use of special beds. Therefore, it would be reasonable to train the prescribers to promote progressive and multidisciplinary treatment of UI.

Eficacia de la intervención farmacéutica en pacientes polimedicados / No disponible

Introducción: La morbilidad y mortalidad relacionada con los medicamentos constituye un gran problema sanitario que generan importantes costes a la administración sanitaria. La posibilidad de sufrir algún problema derivado del uso de los medicamentos (PRM) es mayor cuanto más consume el paciente. Objetivos: Evaluar la eficacia de la intervención farmacéutica en pacientes polimedicados incluidos en un programa de seguimiento farmacoterapéutico (SFT) en la resolución de problemas derivados de los medicamentos (PRM) y mejora de los resultados de la farmacoterapia de los pacientes incluidos en el estudio. Diseño: Estudio cuasi-experimental, de intervención antes-después. Pacientes: 41 pacientes, adultos mayores polimedicados, que padecen al menos una enfermedad crónica. Metodología: Seguimiento farmacoterapéutico según Programa Dáder. Conclusiones: El programa de SFT en pacientes polimedicados ha demostrado su utilidad al haber detectado una media de 1.6 PRM por paciente. Se resuelven un 65.6 % de PRM encontrados. Se ha potenciado la comunicación con otros profesionales implicados en la atención al paciente (AU)

Introduction: Morbidity and mortality related with drugs constitute huge sanitary problems which suppose important costs to Health Administration. Furthermore, the possibility of suffering drug related problems (DRP) is as much high as the patient consume is higher. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of pharmaceutical intervention in polypharmacy patients includes in a Pharmaceutical Care Program (PCP), studying the resolution of DRP and the improvement in pharmacotherapy results over the patients included in this study. Design: Quasi-experimental study, before and after intervention. Patients: 41 patients, older adult polypharmacy patients, who suffer, at least, one chronic disease. Methodology: Dáder program. Conclusions: The program of Pharmacotherapeutic Service on polypharmacy patients has demonstrated being useful so that a medium of 1.6 DRP has been detected. A 65.6% of DRP have been solved. Communication between different professionals implicated in patient care has been increased (AU)